-
I love the converters support in this lib but it would be nice to have an option to use the wrappers that you provide as an extension, in custom wrappers (like UUID) it makes sense to define it at th…
-
When adding the current version of the library there is a build error.
We use protobuf-javalite-4.28.0 in our app.
Duplicate class com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos$UninterpretedOptionOrBuilder…
-
As per [RFC 7950, Section 9.12](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7950#section-9.12), when defining a YANG node with a union data type that includes both string and identityref member types, it…
-
protobuf.js version: 6.8.6
When I attempt to encode a message from a Google well known type (like `google.protobuf.Struct`) I get an empty field in the decoded message IF my path includes `google/p…
-
Is it possible to generate protobuf stubs using my own generated well-known types instead of the pre-generated ones in the protobuf crate?
```protobuf
message ExampleMessageWithWellKnownTypes {
…
-
It seems that protobuf well-known types are not supported out-of-the-box with kotlinx.serialization. It could be nice to have out-of-the-box serialization/deserialization support for at least some pro…
-
I am having trouble using `google.protobuf.Timestamp` in my project. Is there documentation or an example showing how to configure my project to properly handle this protobuf type?
-
protobuf.js version: 6.8.0
I am really surprised that in a library targeting Javascript there is no support for the most important wellknown-types: Struct and Value.
Those types have been *speci…
-
we should be using [Timestamp](https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/reference/google.protobuf#google.protobuf.Timestamp) for fields that represent a date.
-
The protobuf "well-known types" (https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/reference/google.protobuf) are included in every language runtime, including the npm package (see https://github.co…