-
First of all: Great project!!
I have a question about the custom Hamiltonians:
When I run your pre-implemented Heisenberg Hamiltonian after iteration 0 my proposed energy is already somewhere below…
-
There seems to be a mismatch between the dot product between `quantum_LinearOperator` and `hamiltonian` for the same operator and basis:
```python
from __future__ import print_function, division
…
-
Since we are still in beta, I believe it is a good time to discuss some possible changes to the APIs.
Here is one issue that has emerged discussing with @PhilipVinc : for future developments it wo…
-
Hi,
I would like to know if there is a height parameter that can be provided. In the case of length and width, there exists the following: Llength, and Wlength. Is there a similar parameter for heigh…
-
Permit more than two agents per proto (currently exactly two per proto).
-
I just noticed that in `hamiltonians/_general_hubbard_test.py` there is a test
```
def test_fermi_hubbard_square_special_general_equivalence(
x_dimension, y_dimension, tunneling, coulomb,
…
-
Standard Julia already offers a lot of Types and power through multiple dispatch.
Why does this exist: `LinkRule(1/√3), LatticeConstant(0.246)` when the values themselves are enough to dispatch? Wh…
-
As this is a property of the Atom, not the Hamiltonian model, it would make sense to move it.
This is a requirement for #363, as the `Method` *should* not access the `Hamiltonian`s parameters.
-
I asked @idk3 about generating Jellium models and he pointed me to the function `dual_basis_jellium_hamiltonian` in `utils/_low_depth_trotter_error.py`. Doesn't this belong in `hamiltonians/_jellium.p…
-
Hello Developers,
I am trying to introduce a particular driving term in Hubbard Hamiltonian. I described the nature of driving term and the way I am trying to implement it using QuSpin in the below d…
ghost updated
6 years ago