-
The Pico-SDK does not provide an implementation of standard C11 atomic functions, this makes implementing multi-core algorithms more complicated and error prone while decreasing software potability fr…
-
[console_log.txt](https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-c/files/50663/console_log.txt)
[config_log.txt](https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-c/files/50665/config_log.txt)
-
```console
fatal error: error in backend: Cannot select: 0x289ca08: i64,ch = AtomicLoadSub 0x27bbcc8, 0x289c8d0, Constant:i64, third_party/bpf/biff.bpf.c:332:3
0x289c8d0: i64 = BPFISD::Wrapper Tar…
-
## Describe the bug
Right now there are 2 potential issues in replica:
1. The revision counter update and the actual data write are 2 operations rather than 1 atomic operation. In other words, the…
-
This is my attempt to propose that we support fetching atomic operations in `DO CONCURRENT`.
## Motivation
Atomic operations are an integral part of concurrent algorithms. Currently, Fortran ha…
-
Currently, the engine uses atomic operations for pushes to the work queue, but not for pops. Experiment with a lock-free queue for potentially better performance.
-
```
A JRawComparator has to be registered for each type that supports
comparison without deserializing. Currently, such a comparator is provided
for JBinary only.
```
Original issue reported on code.…
-
```
A JRawComparator has to be registered for each type that supports
comparison without deserializing. Currently, such a comparator is provided
for JBinary only.
```
Original issue reported on code.…
-
_From @birkland on March 17, 2017 20:32_
A few questions/confusions related to batch operations surfaced [on IRC](http://irclogs.fcrepo.org/2017-03-17.html). The current specification states that a …
-
The only valid operations on atomics are the builtins. Validate all of the arithmetic operations fail if one of the types is an atomic.
https://www.w3.org/TR/WGSL/#atomic-types