-
## Why
- For Enhancing our skills 💪
- For enjoying iOS/Swift development 🥳
## When
2019/03/05 19:00~20:00
## Where
Pearl Jam (Subject to change)
5F, MG Shirokanedai Building (Wantedly…
-
After some thought, I think removing the IoT section from the standard and encouraging the OWASP IoT Project (https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Internet_of_Things_Project) to re-write the IoT sect…
-
**Issue**
We merged Copy/Paste on Sensitive content. The specific issue that brought this up, [Issue #150](https://github.com/bugcrowd/vulnerability-rating-taxonomy/issues/150) ends with a comment ab…
-
Hi guys,
What do you say about the concept that we keep the ordering of chapters as it is, but set:
0x24 - IoT (Since IoT ASVS is non-existant yet)
0x25 - Mobile security (And refer to MASVS etc …
-
Given https://github.com/OWASP/owasp-mstg/issues/964 , we need to do the same for MASVS (try gitbook first).
- [x] Fix header and footer
- [x] Get images for first two pages (@sushi2k ?) or simplify…
-
Do we still need the images folder and its contents? I didn't notice any images in the exportable formats.
-
MASVS 7.2: The app has been built in release mode, with settings appropriate for a release build (e.g. non-debuggable).
See Android Test Case: https://mobile-security.gitbook.io/mobile-security-tes…
-
The checklist (XLS) needs updating right before going to 1.2.0 of the MASVS.
-
Hi
It would be really great if ASVS aligns with the OWASP Testing guide in a similar way to what was done with the MASVS and checklist for mobile. I run an appsec program that is using the mobile s…
D00gs updated
5 years ago
-
The logo is the MASVS one, not the ASVS one
The currently available 4.0 Word document is a lot different from the Markdown pages. I think there was a problem in the script that generated the docum…