-
I am using lcov version 2.1, and I see this in the coverage report:
As you can see, every single line in the function is marked covered, but somehow the function signature line is not.
I th…
-
Now that we're no longer on a coverage fork, we should switch on branch coverage (once we get that up to 100%)
-
_Context: longer description [here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sVlhlq5l5SR-wFapNjUCLAqiOgufTvAS2KX8-N4XtuE/edit?usp=sharing), tldr: in large monorepos, users often do not run every test on ev…
-
**Describe the bug**
Using `COVERAGE_CORE=sysmon` with branch coverage can be 2x slower than default. Note the 2x likely depends on the code whose coverage is measured. Trying different variations of…
-
```
$ curl -L https://coveralls.io/coveralls-linux.tar.gz | tar -xz -C .
$ ./coveralls --help
Coveralls Coverage Reporter v0.6.14
Usage: coveralls [command] [options]
report …
-
### Steps to reproduce
* JaCoCo version: 0.8.7
* Operating system: OSX
* Build Pipeline: Gradle/Android
* Minimal Example Code:
```
// SomeClass.kt
sealed class Event {
object Foo : Ev…
-
### What is the problem this feature would solve?
Sometimes might be edge cases or rare that you might want to exclude or delegated to helper functions. For example I'm making a little CLI tool and m…
-
Is it possible to add support of branch coverage to luacov?
Right now luacov supports only coverage by statements and coverage by paths (#49) and branch coverage would be interesting too.
-
Code coverage is looking really good. But the testing of branches is falling behind so we should make an effort to try and raise that number a bit.
## Low hanging fruits
- [ ] PermissionSet
…
-
```
If you call gcov with "gcov -b -c", it provides enough information that you
can measure both branch and condition coverage. It would be really nice if
CoverStory handled them also.
(If you do wor…