-
```
See subject line. i can't imagine how client code can use the class if its ctor
is protected. Changing it to public "works for me."
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `sgbeal@goog…
-
```
See subject line. i can't imagine how client code can use the class if its ctor
is protected. Changing it to public "works for me."
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `sgbeal@goog…
-
```
See subject line. i can't imagine how client code can use the class if its ctor
is protected. Changing it to public "works for me."
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `sgbeal@goog…
-
```
See subject line. i can't imagine how client code can use the class if its ctor
is protected. Changing it to public "works for me."
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `sgbeal@goog…
-
```
See subject line. i can't imagine how client code can use the class if its ctor
is protected. Changing it to public "works for me."
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `sgbeal@goog…
-
```
See subject line. i can't imagine how client code can use the class if its ctor
is protected. Changing it to public "works for me."
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `sgbeal@goog…
-
```
See subject line. i can't imagine how client code can use the class if its ctor
is protected. Changing it to public "works for me."
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `sgbeal@goog…
-
```
See subject line. i can't imagine how client code can use the class if its ctor
is protected. Changing it to public "works for me."
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `sgbeal@goog…
-
Getting few instances of NumberFormatException reported through Firebase, here's the full stack-trace:
```
Fatal Exception: java.lang.NumberFormatException: Invalid int: "te"
at java.lang.…
-
when ColorPickerDialog is visible and screen is rotated, older view is not cleared and new view is drawn. and the final view is corrupted