-
### 🚀 Feature Proposal
An easy way to run Jest but generate coverage separately for each test file.
### Motivation
A common pattern is to have a test file for each source file. But coverage is gene…
-
https://github.com/taiki-e/cargo-llvm-cov
https://github.com/mozilla/grcov
-
Would be interesting to have an idea of the current coverage of our tests
Jest doc
https://jestjs.io/docs/configuration#collectcoverage-boolean
-
At least two issues I've spotted so far:
1. Abstract modules seem to be marked as not covered even if at least one concrete refining module has executed the code. See coverage report for Strings an…
-
### Version
v22.8.0
### Platform
```text
Darwin TRI-N93DLJDY6Y 23.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 23.6.0: Mon Jul 29 21:14:30 PDT 2024; root:xnu-10063.141.2~1/RELEASE_ARM64_T6000 arm64
```
#…
-
I'm not sure if this is possible at all, but it would be very neat to get a coverage report for the type tests, to avoid a situation like with `HasMultipleCallSignatures` in https://github.com/sindres…
-
- Rollup Plugin Name: `@rollup/plugin-typescript`
- Rollup Plugin Version: 12.1.0
- Rollup Version: 4.22.5
- Operating System (or Browser): MacOS 14
- Node Version: 20.17.0
- Link to reproduc…
-
It was discussed in https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/33146#issuecomment-2146720903 but looking at https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/33524 I think it would be nice if mkosi provided a way …
-
-
Figma link: https://www.figma.com/design/4Z7yb2dkIIATkfzpWoMYQq/GH-2220?node-id=1-2
Update UI copy on 4 and 5
![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/be13f0b8-ee83-40e8-9b02-ba8a2c40b3a2)