-
Hello,
I just stumpled upon this. Is this package ready to use? Is it finished? Does it work?
I would love to see some documentation and examples. It would be nice to have inline Haddock documen…
ghost updated
7 years ago
-
https://haskell-haddock.readthedocs.io/latest/multi-components.html
-
For 1.2, no haddock was generated on hackage. If haddock generation on hackage is unreliable, we should probably create haddocks ourselves and deploy them on hackage.
-
For reasons that are entirely inexplicable to me, your haddock is generating an error:
Data/Aeson/JsonInfo.hs:35:21:
parse error on input ‘-- ^ the accessor’
I would include a patch, but I c…
-
Current implementation of concepts lacks Haddock comments. We need to add them as part of converting `concepts` into a library package and putting it on Hackage.
Haddock syntax: https://www.haskell.o…
-
I'm seeing build failures during the haddock phase. Heres' the error message:
```
haddock: internal error: internal: extractDecl
CallStack (from HasCallStack):
error, called at utils/haddock/…
-
### General summary/comments (optional)
I'm trying very hard to get stack to use a patched version of haddock. There is no flag that I can find which allows me to do this. `stack build haddock` with …
-
Has it been considered to merge this code into haddock proper, as a haddock subcommand?
-
When running `cabal haddock --haddock-for-hackage` it results in a `.tar.gz` file being created.
But trying to upload it (chrome, firefox) I'm getting the error:
> Unexpected content-type
> For…
dpwiz updated
1 month ago
-
As per the [haddock documentation](https://haskell-haddock.readthedocs.io/en/latest/markup.html), Haskell code can appear in Haddock comments in the following ways:
```haskell
-- code blocks:
-- …
sheaf updated
4 years ago