-
```
There seems to be a regression in Hamcrest 1.3.RC2 (might date from earlier
versions) when compared to Hamcrest 1.1, to do with nested matchers. The
following test case works in Hamcrest 1.1:
…
-
```
There seems to be a regression in Hamcrest 1.3.RC2 (might date from earlier
versions) when compared to Hamcrest 1.1, to do with nested matchers. The
following test case works in Hamcrest 1.1:
…
-
```
There seems to be a regression in Hamcrest 1.3.RC2 (might date from earlier
versions) when compared to Hamcrest 1.1, to do with nested matchers. The
following test case works in Hamcrest 1.1:
…
-
### Description
After updating my espresso dependency from v3.3.0 to v3.4.0 my project complains that it can't find `hamcrest Matchers`.
I'm using the following espresso dependencies:
```
…
-
**Affects PMD Version:** 7.0.0-rc3
**Rule:** [JUnitAssertionsShouldIncludeMessage](https://docs.pmd-code.org/pmd-doc-7.0.0-rc3/pmd_rules_java_bestpractices.html#junitassertionsshouldincludemess…
dant3 updated
6 months ago
-
```
There seems to be a regression in Hamcrest 1.3.RC2 (might date from earlier
versions) when compared to Hamcrest 1.1, to do with nested matchers. The
following test case works in Hamcrest 1.1:
…
-
```
There seems to be a regression in Hamcrest 1.3.RC2 (might date from earlier
versions) when compared to Hamcrest 1.1, to do with nested matchers. The
following test case works in Hamcrest 1.1:
…
-
```
There seems to be a regression in Hamcrest 1.3.RC2 (might date from earlier
versions) when compared to Hamcrest 1.1, to do with nested matchers. The
following test case works in Hamcrest 1.1:
…
-
```
There seems to be a regression in Hamcrest 1.3.RC2 (might date from earlier
versions) when compared to Hamcrest 1.1, to do with nested matchers. The
following test case works in Hamcrest 1.1:
…
-
```
There seems to be a regression in Hamcrest 1.3.RC2 (might date from earlier
versions) when compared to Hamcrest 1.1, to do with nested matchers. The
following test case works in Hamcrest 1.1:
…