-
Can you add the support of RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3?
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9266
Little details, to know easily:
- tls-unique for TLS =< 1.2
- tls-server-end-p…
-
```
[2023-12-31T21:30:03Z WARN privaxy::proxy::mitm] Unable to perform handshake for host: graph.facebook.com:443. Consider excluding it from blocking. The service may not tolerate TLS interception.…
-
Dear @naqvis,
Can you add the support of RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3?
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9266
Little details, to know easily:
- tls-unique for TLS =< 1.2
-…
-
### Tell us about your idea!
Provide a health signal when connectivity is blocked by a TLS MITM self-signed certificate
### What are you trying to do?
We have had a few instances where connectivity…
-
Dear @vukoye,
Can you add the support of RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3?
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9266
Channel Bindings for TLS: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/…
-
Dear @jonhoo,
Can you add the support of RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3?
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9266
Channel Bindings for TLS: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/…
-
Given the current security issues for authenticated users, we should add a default TLS option for users to prevent MITM and sniffing attacks.
-
**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
I'm always frustrated when there are crazy new bot detections tools that exploit stuff like tls fingerprint and cutting edge http pr…
-
Dear @geobra,
Can you add the support of RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3?
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9266
Channel Bindings for TLS: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/…
-
Getting the following error
[026] WARN: Cannot read TLS response from mitm'd server dial tcp: lookup account.microsoftonline.com on 8.8.8.8:53