-
Clauses that match on `DefP` are ignored by the positivity checker:
https://github.com/agda/agda/blob/a1231ba17621fa3334f229c8273af6c4e98ed68a/src/full/Agda/TypeChecking/Positivity.hs#L408-L413
http…
-
please direct me towards some
-
```aya
data Dead : Set
open data Zaoqi (A : Type)
| essentially (A -> Dead)
open data Cat : Type
| meow : (Zaoqi Cat) → Cat
def catIsDead : Cat → Dead
| meow (essentially f) => f (meow (e…
-
Hi @wesselb,
If I am getting it right, Varz handles positivity constraints with `exp(x)` transformation which could be explosive for large values. How about adding more stable transformations for p…
-
I am interested in seeing what happens when all positivity requirements are turning off, however removing all reference to it in the input card seems to crash things, i.e. it seems to need at least on…
-
Some extensions for the `positivity` tactic deal with more advanced mathematics, and are implemented in-place in the library as the concepts are defined. Others deal with basic mathematics and in mat…
-
Hello,
The positivity preserving feature `PositivityPreservingLimiterZhangShu` does not seem to work for `GaussSBP()` with the time stepper `SSPRK43()` or ` CarpenterKennedy2N54`
1D Compressibl…
-
Hey there, maintainers! 👋 Just thought I'd pop by to see if everything's alright. Been trying to get some attention on [insert issue link here] for a while now, but it seems my messages are getting le…
-
https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.06268
Another cool one @ranocha !
-
I'm wondering if it would be possible to add a flag which allows types like the following, which are positive (but not strictly positive):
```agda
record _↬_ (A : Type a) (B : Type b) : Type (a ℓ⊔…
oisdk updated
3 years ago