-
## 現状と課題
入力値検証で例外が発生し、`400 Bad Request`を返す場合、その`message`を`INFO`レベルで記録しているが、
レスポンスボディは空にしている。
受け取った側が分かりやすいように、エラーの概要をメッセージボディで返したい。
なお、単純に例外の`message`を返すだけだと、`MethodArgumentNotValidException`と…
-
We are seeing an issue with the Speculation API in Chrome where all 2xx responses are considered successful in the Speculation window, but 304s are considered failures. We are also seeing a message in…
-
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7807 appears to be super useful for most JSON/XML APIs, so we should support it.
-
RFC 9457 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9457.html) defines a Problem Details response for HTTP APIs.
It proposes a standard response object to explicit the error (instead of just returning erro…
-
### Summary
A Boolean option to enable [RFC7807](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7807#section-6.1) support might be a good way to enable this otherwise breaking change.
ie: ` app = Litest…
-
In the swagger API documentation file (OSDM-online-api-v3.0.3.yml) is there a reference to RFC 7807. Should this be replaced with reference to [RFC 9457: Problem Details for HTTP APIs](https://datatr…
-
Opened by @aphillips via IRC channel #i18n on irc.w3.org
Due: 2024-04-04 (Thursday 4 April)
-
The current specifications, while complying, does not directly follow the standard as they need a URI, among other stuff. See [Defining New Problem Types](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9457.html#n…
-
Right now Spring Boot is using an ad hoc format for error responses. Often, applications are configured to support JSON/XML formats and the error map is serialized with such message converters for mac…
-
RFC 7807 is deprecated in favor of RFC 9457.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9457.html
https://blog.frankel.ch/problem-details-http-apis/