-
During the one-off Annotation meeting on 12-15-23, consensus was reached that (see "Annotation-Discussion-12-15" minutes on TRMC):
- either skos:altLabel or cco:acronym will be used for all acronyms
…
-
```
cvs checkout: Updating psi/psi-ms/mzML/controlledVocabulary
U psi/psi-ms/mzML/controlledVocabulary/2014_Schober_etal_Ontology usage in Omics Standards Initiatives_Pros and Cons of enriching XML …
-
- [ ] Develop water quality data exchange best practices and standards through OGC and HDWG #7
- [ ] Extend WHOS Ontology with water quality parameters
- [ ] Extend WHOS DAB with STA accessor
-
This is an "epic" issue, just as a placeholder to reference various efforts towards standardizing synonym type definitions across the OBO Foundry
## Background
These are the two precursor discus…
-
An email needs to be circulated to all gfbio partners. It should give them a brief update on the ontology development (purpose and worfklow) and ask them how they would use a top level ontology and
i…
-
Ideas of media/meetings where we could promote the ontology:
### Meetings
- Working Group ESS Standards in November (Marie-Christine)
-
My question was raised by @SepidehAlassi's answer to #389.
In Knora-base ontology documentation:
> A subclass of kb:Resource may additionally be a subclass of any other class, e.g. an industry-st…
-
Especially the age standards. See https://github.com/SciCrunch/NIF-Ontology/issues/49
-
Not sure how best to organize this, so it is stream of consciousness for now. Feel free to flesh out. @mellybelly
### Phenotype Standards:
- phenopackets
- minimum phenotype standard
- Annotation suf…
-
Different standards require different checks for additionality assessment. How should the ontology distinguish between different degrees of comprehensiveness in the assessment of additionality?