-
We eventually want to support full-on automated theorem prover integration, but would it be possible to model a handful of simple relationships between spaces ("is a (closed) subspace of", "is a produ…
-
**Project title**
*jsonschema.lean -- an implementation of JSON Schema in Lean*
**Brief Description**
[Lean](https://lean-lang.org/) is an extremely interesting and up and coming programming …
-
This ticket combines the previously separate tickets #42, #43, #45, #46, #55, and #56.
We should write a formal semantics for Cryptol, preferably mechanized in an interactive theorem prover. Ideall…
-
You thinking of furthering this? Still to this day, I can't find a good theorem prover in c++.
-
Hi,
It seems that for each core theory there are two HTML pages generated in the help page. One is that you directly click the theory names from the HOL Reference Page (`help/index.html`), the oth…
-
I would like to start a discussion about the need for a method to do a functional equivalency check
between 2 models.
As I've started playing around with the RISC-V Sail model, I can see places w…
-
The Sail model needs to be updated to include the proposed bitmanip instructions.
This needs to be done in such a way so as to enable the generation of emulators (OCaml and C) as well as theorem prov…
-
Currently new cells receive default names `Cell n`. This could be changed to produce `Generator n` (if created using `target`), or `Definition n`/`Proof n` (if created using `theorem`).
This would …
-
Hello from the Lean prover community.
I would be interested to see a list of mathematical statements (theorems, conjectures) which this project is interested in formalising. The reason for this is …
-
Most, or at least some theorem provers include backends that output proofs in some format. It would be nice if frogtptp and/or frogmap was able to produce these proofs and check them with the appropri…
Gbury updated
7 years ago