-
See e.g. https://github.com/sindresorhus/Awesome-WebExtensions#testing for mocking Chrome APIs and addon validation
-
The W3C will be holding [TPAC 2024](https://www.w3.org/2024/09/TPAC/) in Anaheim, CA, USA on September 23-27. This thread will serve as our primary discussion area for planning and scheduling purposes…
-
### MDN URL
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/WebExtensions/Content_scripts
### What specific section or headline is this issue about?
XHR and Fetch
### What information was…
-
In Firefox 57 all support for extensions written using other APIs than WebExtensions will stop working.
This issue is about converting FF-Remote-Control to using WebExtensions.
Being the origina…
-
Awesome extension. Do you plan to upload it to the Firefox addon store?
Most extensions are easy to convert https://vimeo.com/241435808
list of APIs https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/Web…
-
The addon must be ported to WebExtensions!
At firefox 57 or higher it won't work anymore, because XUL/XPCOM overlays are outdated and no more provided then.
**Information at developer.mozilla.org:…
-
Need to decide on and call out how this interacts with extension APIs such as https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/WebExtensions/API/browserSettings/overrideContentColorScheme (or …
-
## Enhancement request
If you can, please make this five-star extension use WebExtensions APIs – so that users can continue with it in Firefox 57 and greater.
Thanks 👍
-
Hi! Do you have any plans to support Firefox? Firefox extensions have the same format as Chrome extensions these days. https://vimeo.com/241435808 There are a few different APIs but they are mostly th…
-
Mozilla is working on making [WebExtensions available in Firefox](https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebExtensions) (dropping XPCOM, XUL and jetpack); API will be the same as [Chrome extensions](https://develop…