-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Create a new test class extending ActivityInstrumentationTestCase2
2. Add some standard JUnit style 3 tests
2. Follow all steps to convert to JUnit 4
(h…
-
### Is there an existing issue for this?
- [X] I have searched the existing issues
### Is there a StackOverflow question about this issue?
- [X] I have searched StackOverflow
### What happened?
#…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Write an empty test with a before class method
2. add as content of the beforeClass method this:
ClassPool cp = ClassPool.getDefault();
Ct…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
Run this test class:
@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
public class ExpectedExceptionTest {
@Rule
public ExpectedException thrown = ExpectedExceptio…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
Run this test class:
@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
public class ExpectedExceptionTest {
@Rule
public ExpectedException thrown = ExpectedExceptio…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.Create test
@RunWith(AndroidJUnit4.class)
public class SetupAccountWizardTest {
@Rule
public IntentsTestRule testCase = new IntentsTestRule(AccountWiza…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.Create test
@RunWith(AndroidJUnit4.class)
public class SetupAccountWizardTest {
@Rule
public IntentsTestRule testCase = new IntentsTestRule(AccountWiza…
-
Noted while fixing #2521. I get an unexpected error when I add this AP to DT_VB_NN:
```
Paint
it
Black
```
I get this unexpected testrules error:
```
Exception in thread …
-
https://github.com/TWiStErRob/net.twisterrob.libraries/actions/runs/4408294367/jobs/7723597661
```
java.lang.AssertionError: Execution finished too fast: 1420, expected minimum time to execute: 15…
-
### Description
The new `BackgroundTestRule` works well for running tests off the main thread, however, frequently these types of tests will require some work to be done on main. That does not appe…