-
```
See also issue 270.
$ licensecheck -r . | egrep -v "BSD|Apache|Public domain"
./src/common/convert_UTF.c: UNKNOWN
./src/common/md5.h: UNKNOWN
./src/common/convert_UTF.h: UNKNOWN
./src/processor/s…
-
```
See also issue 270.
$ licensecheck -r . | egrep -v "BSD|Apache|Public domain"
./src/common/convert_UTF.c: UNKNOWN
./src/common/md5.h: UNKNOWN
./src/common/convert_UTF.h: UNKNOWN
./src/processor/s…
-
```
See also issue 270.
$ licensecheck -r . | egrep -v "BSD|Apache|Public domain"
./src/common/convert_UTF.c: UNKNOWN
./src/common/md5.h: UNKNOWN
./src/common/convert_UTF.h: UNKNOWN
./src/processor/s…
-
Where can I find the information about the license of the model files which can be loaded by `./translateLocally -d `?
Please add that information to the project page.
-
Current `vet` supports writing simple policies to block packages with licenses identified by the SPDX code e.g. `GPL-2.0`. However, background knowledge is required to identify permissiveness of diffe…
-
## Justification
Anaconda quietly changed their licensing agreement earlier this year (March 2024) to clarify that they no longer allow the use `miniconda` or of packages from the `default` channel…
-
```
There are (at lest) two files in the repository that are not licensed under the
New BSD License like the web page and the LICENCE file states.
The files and licences are:
- src/client/mac/handle…
-
```
There are (at lest) two files in the repository that are not licensed under the
New BSD License like the web page and the LICENCE file states.
The files and licences are:
- src/client/mac/handle…
-
```
There are (at lest) two files in the repository that are not licensed under the
New BSD License like the web page and the LICENCE file states.
The files and licences are:
- src/client/mac/handle…
-
```
There are (at lest) two files in the repository that are not licensed under the
New BSD License like the web page and the LICENCE file states.
The files and licences are:
- src/client/mac/handle…