-
```
Initial analysis indicates the Android support would require very little to
no core changes to the engine. If so, it is possible to implement Android
support for jME3.
An implementation of Androi…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Install glide64 with project 64 1.6
2.Go to settings in project 64 1.6
What is the expected output? What do you see instead? I expected to see the
sett…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Install glide64 with project 64 1.6
2.Go to settings in project 64 1.6
What is the expected output? What do you see instead? I expected to see the
sett…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Install glide64 with project 64 1.6
2.Go to settings in project 64 1.6
What is the expected output? What do you see instead? I expected to see the
sett…
-
Cobertura does not report coverage in Sonar for this project. I find the below error in jenkins log.
Using Java7 and Cobertura 2.0.3
[INFO] --- cobertura-maven-plugin:2.6:instrument (default-cli) @ …
-
```
Initial analysis indicates the Android support would require very little to
no core changes to the engine. If so, it is possible to implement Android
support for jME3.
An implementation of Androi…
-
```
Initial analysis indicates the Android support would require very little to
no core changes to the engine. If so, it is possible to implement Android
support for jME3.
An implementation of Androi…
-
```
Initial analysis indicates the Android support would require very little to
no core changes to the engine. If so, it is possible to implement Android
support for jME3.
An implementation of Androi…
-
I have a NancyFx app which uses the default bootstrapper. This automatically discovers and registers at startup all classes which implement `IApplicationStartup` interface and `IRequestStartup`, respe…
-
beta005 output seems to be broken a bit. The output looks like everything is broken but otherwise it seems to work.
```
$.paket/paket.exe update …