-
This depends on #768 and #769.
This will be dreadful but please help with this one. If everyone in the community wrote a couple of tests we should have some relevant coverage.
TODO: subtask.
-
See below for a simple program that reports statements as uncovered when they are covered.
### What version of Go are you using (`go version`)?
go version go1.11 darwin/amd64
### Does this issu…
-
**Describe the bug**
On the back of the PR #71 which was reverted from `master` due to breaking changes, would be best to review, and fix either implement/tests or both and merge to master.
**To…
-
After adding a new condition to an if statement, I noticed that my code coverage did not decrease. It turns out that it's possible to get 100% coverage in all aspects without really getting good cov…
-
### Describe a bug
Action failing even when all tests and coverage has passed
### Expected behavior
Would expect action to pass if test and code coverage have passed.
### Details
- Ac…
-
This function does not have 100% branch coverage of
`if ext in exts:`
-
Hello,
We are using this gem to generate the cobertura report from simplecov to display on Jenkins.
However, Jenkins is complaining that it has duplicated classes when processing it. Every class…
-
https://github.com/jpb06/coverage-badges-action/issues/5#issuecomment-2171692242
> Hi, I'm interested to know if there are any plans to add a feature that allows us to see the change in coverage, c…
jpb06 updated
4 months ago
-
In https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/pull/13357 we implement `ExampleMacro` and `XdocsTemplateParser` but both do not have full coverage from tests.
```
[WARNING] Rule violated for class com.…
-
### Description
The codecov github action seems to randomly fail, at least in PRs, even when the change in the PR doesn't affect source code or tests.
**Minimal code-snippet showcasing the problem…