-
Currently, the solver returns something like `A:0.5`, but @Wiljea suggested that we could return `A=0.5` instead. @Wiljea was thinking of returning equations, but we could use the newly created assign…
-
# Autoregressive Renaissance in Neural PDE Solvers | ICLR Blogposts 2023
Recent developments in the field of neural partial differential equation (PDE) solvers have placed a strong emphasis on neural…
-
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. ensure that you are running the Nov 8 2007 version with fix for issue34
applied.
2.
load
3. increase narrowing bound:
:bounds narrow 300
4. :reload fil…
-
Dear Patrick,
Thanks for this library, it's pretty neat!
I'm currently supervising a bachelor's students thesis on NeuralODEs, and we've been meaning to use `diffrax` to study delay differentia…
-
Because... Why not? If we assume that integrals are working, we can solve some trivial cases. For example, consider first order linear differential equation:
`y' + y*f(x) = g(x)`
first we compute `e^(…
-
Hi Patrick
I am trying to calculate the first order sensitivity w.r.t. to all the three kinetic parameters for the Robertson Equations using `diffrax`. I am using the stiff ODE example provided [he…
sn248 updated
1 month ago
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. ensure that you are running the Nov 8 2007 version with fix for issue34
applied.
2.
load
3. increase narrowing bound:
:bounds narrow 300
4. :reload fil…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. ensure that you are running the Nov 8 2007 version with fix for issue34
applied.
2.
load
3. increase narrowing bound:
:bounds narrow 300
4. :reload fil…
-
Would be great to have a benchmark for IDE PINNs.