-
### Overview
Based on usability testing, we want to make the date range text boxes function similarly to the calendar dropdown button so that users can access the calendar more easily.
### Actio…
-
Currently we are using classes and inheritance from `React.Component` to create the components. With the advent of React v0.14, we can simply make these functions to reduce complexity and increase per…
-
When we began developing the workbench, class components were the standard and functional components were new. React has moved away from class components, and functional components are the standard. I…
emlys updated
5 months ago
-
https://github.com/d-ivashchuk/memory-helper/blob/0ea43d5c6eb9e4175ceabf94ad60727c184a231f/src/Header/header.jsx#L3
-
https://github.com/stefem/jammming/blob/master/src/components/SearchResults/SearchResults.js
The `class` syntax is the standard way to define a React component. But it's kind of a lot of ritual for…
ghost updated
6 years ago
-
Hi! It would be great if the types allowed `React.FunctionComponent` to be the argument of functions like `withAuth` and others.
-
The `class` syntax is the standard way to define a React component. But it's kind of a lot of ritual for a component that doesn't refer to `this.state` and only has a `render()` function (like [Track…
ghost updated
7 years ago
-
The `class` syntax is the standard way to define a React component. But it's kind of a lot of ritual for a component that doesn't refer to `this.state` and only has a `render()` function (like [Track…
ghost updated
7 years ago
-
https://github.com/ozbo1973/bwa-u3-jammming-prj/blob/master/Jamming-Review/src/Components/SearchResults/SearchResults.js
The `class` syntax is the standard way to define a React component. But it's…
ghost updated
7 years ago
-
As the tendency of React and WordPress is to move towards functional components code, I suggest that the block is refactored to use this.
At the same time jQuery could be removed from the block cod…
fului updated
5 months ago