-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. If you type U+1081 then U+102F or U+1030, the result is not very readable.
2. I think stylistically U+1083 should have some kind of "tail" on the descend,…
-
I tested all the fonts (minus the duplicate, i.e. Alef, EkMukta, JosefinSansStd, MrBedfort, MrsSaintDelafield, Siemreap, and TerminalDosis) from the GF repo in the Font Book application (macOS 10.12.6…
-
This https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/discussions/4784 discussion now moved here and below.
Last relevant comments copied below...
Thanks for working on this. I see that the unicode marks no…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. If you type U+1081 then U+102F or U+1030, the result is not very readable.
2. I think stylistically U+1083 should have some kind of "tail" on the descend,…
-
I have noticed that some pdfs, when converting from a .docx do not have the right fonts, would it be possible to add custom fonts somehow?
Or install more default fonts in the Dockerfile Base like …
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. If you type U+1081 then U+102F or U+1030, the result is not very readable.
2. I think stylistically U+1083 should have some kind of "tail" on the descend,…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. If you type U+1081 then U+102F or U+1030, the result is not very readable.
2. I think stylistically U+1083 should have some kind of "tail" on the descend,…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. If you type U+1081 then U+102F or U+1030, the result is not very readable.
2. I think stylistically U+1083 should have some kind of "tail" on the descend,…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. If you type U+1081 then U+102F or U+1030, the result is not very readable.
2. I think stylistically U+1083 should have some kind of "tail" on the descend,…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. If you type U+1081 then U+102F or U+1030, the result is not very readable.
2. I think stylistically U+1083 should have some kind of "tail" on the descend,…