-
I am concerned about this not full information in the Directory.
Could we have a scale - Peppol directory contains information of 7578 (exact number) of 75000 participants in Peppol (count in SML). …
-
If the MLR is considered a message between the sender AP (C2) and receiver AP (C3) both AP's must be addressable outside the transport scope. This can be done by making a reference to these AP's in th…
-
I want to get Peppol Directory business cards and document types (at least for my country) and build Peppol Directory for my app.
I don't have a good way to get the Peppol directory data.
Any good i…
-
Hello,
when using the validator with die actual Validator Configuration from 2023-11-15 we receive in UBL for example for Codes PEPPOL-EN16931-R020, PEPPOL-EN16931-R010 an error, when validating th…
-
Í framhaldi af inngöngu Íslands í OpenPeppol þá munu rafrænir reikningar skv. TS236 byggjast beint á Peppol BIS Billing í stað þess að vera innlent afrit.
Gera þarf uppfærslu á Tækniforskrift TS236…
-
compare these searches;
https://directory.peppol.eu/search/1.0/json?q=Arbetsf%C3%B6rmedlingen
as for this search we get the hit on the q search on arbetsförmedlingen
but for this search no hits o…
-
We recently run into an issue where we do a lookup but the SMP(in this case smp.difi.no) returns an xml header with a commented out body together with HTTP status 404. Curl output follows below.
In n…
orco updated
9 months ago
-
E.g. for the French PoC, a self-signed root is used, for which no OSCP service is available.
phax updated
8 months ago
-
As a user of the Peppol Directory, I would like to be able to filter and/or sort my findings based on the **Prefix** of the Peppol participant ID or the countrycode entity of the participant in the Bu…
-
We are running into problems with sending invoices through Peppol using SI UBL 2.0 when our clients try to send to Dutch recipients having a NL:VAT (9944) identifier, e.g. ProRail with [9944:nl8041700…