-
```
Please, consider using google protocol buffers to allow easier evolution and
implementation.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `lehph...@gmail.com` on 12 Sep 2010 at 9:48
-
```
Please, consider using google protocol buffers to allow easier evolution and
implementation.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `lehph...@gmail.com` on 12 Sep 2010 at 9:48
-
```
Please, consider using google protocol buffers to allow easier evolution and
implementation.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `lehph...@gmail.com` on 12 Sep 2010 at 9:48
-
```
Protocol Buffers has been upgraded to 2.6. Would be nice if protobuf-rpc-pro
used that. Would also be nice if it would use the lite runtime instead. Don't
know if that's possible but if it is I …
-
```
Please, consider using google protocol buffers to allow easier evolution and
implementation.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `lehph...@gmail.com` on 12 Sep 2010 at 9:48
-
```
Protocol Buffers has been upgraded to 2.6. Would be nice if protobuf-rpc-pro
used that. Would also be nice if it would use the lite runtime instead. Don't
know if that's possible but if it is I …
-
```
Please, consider using google protocol buffers to allow easier evolution and
implementation.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `lehph...@gmail.com` on 12 Sep 2010 at 9:48
-
```
Please, consider using google protocol buffers to allow easier evolution and
implementation.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `lehph...@gmail.com` on 12 Sep 2010 at 9:48
-
**Google Protocol Buffers** (GPB, [https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/):](https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/):)
> Protocol buffers are Google's language-neutral, platform-neu…
-
```
Please, consider using google protocol buffers to allow easier evolution and
implementation.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `lehph...@gmail.com` on 12 Sep 2010 at 9:48