-
"When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802…
-
Dear @djc,
Can you add supports of :
- SCRAM-SHA-1
- SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-256
- SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-512
- SCRAM-SHA-512-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA3-512
- SCRAM-SHA3-512-PLUS
You…
-
RFC8600:
> "When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 varia…
-
"When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802…
-
After:
- SCRAM-SHA-1
Can you add supports of :
- SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-224
- SCRAM-SHA-224-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-256
- SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-384
- SCRAM-SHA-384-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA…
-
"When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802…
-
There is only SCRAM-SHA-1, there is not SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS:
- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5802
- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6120
There is not SCRAM-SHA-256 and SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS:
- https:/…
-
@yang-zzhong: Can you add other SCRAM supports and missing TLS Binding?
After:
- SCRAM-SHA-1
- SCRAM-SHA-256
Can you add supports of :
- SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-51…
-
"When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802…
-
After:
- SCRAM-SHA-1
Can you add supports of :
- SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-224
- SCRAM-SHA-224-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-256
- SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-384
- SCRAM-SHA-384-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA…