-
There is only SCRAM-SHA-1, there is not SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS:
- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5802
- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6120
There is not SCRAM-SHA-256 and SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS:
- https:/…
-
It has happened on one occasion that instead of the short 18-byte hashsum (24 base64url symbols) a full 32-byte hashsum has been inserted into the magic SPARQL index, despite the RDF containing the co…
-
I would like to know the position on this.
JWAT used the algorithm specified in the digest header directly.
So JWAT expects "SHA-256" since that seems to be the official name and the name supported …
-
RFC 7616 defines a new algorithm header field and specifies SHA-256 and SHA-512/256 as valid options. It still supports MD5 for backwards compatibility, but explicitly recommends against it.
-
For more:
* https://kerkour.com/sha256-length-extension-attacks
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36058754
-
Downloaded images-0d1384c.tar.xz.
Extracted u-boot-lzo-with-spl.bin.
SHA-256: _9f432fd663892b9214ccecce40cc45801dbb7adc0bf0fec11f3ef3e232d9a000_
https://github.com/anmaped/openfang/blob/master/do…
-
I use different path to calculate the SHA-256, and I get the different results!
![A`9~XE_(BL}I U~X _4LPH6](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33087260/74809741-da085d80-5328-11ea-8480-42fb28…
-
### Describe the bug
If the user doesn't exist then we'll try to authenticate several times before failing, when it should be just a single attempt
### To Reproduce
1) start a postgres server (the …
-
SCRAM-SHA-256 seems to be a SASL mechanism that IRCv3 thinks should be implemented.
- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7677
- via http://ircv3.net/docs/sasl-mechs.html via https://github.com/ircv3/irc…
-
Hello,
I am really enjoying this bundle!
There is just one thing that doesn't seem to work.
When the ADFS is configured to use SHA-256 as signing algorithm and the SP SSL certificate is signed as SHA…