-
```
As in the subject, you could achieve no-overhead function calls by exploiting
generics programming.
For example, as you already have, define the Animation mode:
enum
{
EaseIn,
EaseOut,
…
-
```
As in the subject, you could achieve no-overhead function calls by exploiting
generics programming.
For example, as you already have, define the Animation mode:
enum
{
EaseIn,
EaseOut,
…
-
| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [6708](https://llvm.org/bz6708) |
| Version | trunk |
| OS | All |
| Reporter | LLVM Bugzilla Contributor |
| CC | @chandlerc,@DougGregor |
## Extended Descrip…
-
I got jni-bind working on Windows but needed to work-around a difference in how Oracle JDK 19 defines `jint`.
On Linux:
```
typedef int jint;
```
On Windows (comment from the JDK preserved…
-
# Issue Proposal: Advanced C++ Feature Implementation and Documentation
## Description
Develop an advanced feature in C++ that goes beyond basic tutorials, aiming to enhance mastery of the langu…
-
```
As in the subject, you could achieve no-overhead function calls by exploiting
generics programming.
For example, as you already have, define the Animation mode:
enum
{
EaseIn,
EaseOut,
…
-
Currently, we have Velocity or Position commands that we used to assume were always in Radians.
However, now, sometimes, they may be in terms of meters. In this case, we set the value "mAvoidConversi…
-
```
As in the subject, you could achieve no-overhead function calls by exploiting
generics programming.
For example, as you already have, define the Animation mode:
enum
{
EaseIn,
EaseOut,
…
-
I've been thinking of adding an `OrderedHandleGraph` type. However, that would double the size of our class hierarchy again, based on whether ordering is supported.
What I want to do is have a `Han…
-
- [x] Learning notes
- [ ] Testcases and demos