-
```
It is often convenient to use a decorated C# class as the authoritative
definition of message types for serialisation, rather than use .proto files.
Once the type is defined in C#, it's easy en…
-
```
It is often convenient to use a decorated C# class as the authoritative
definition of message types for serialisation, rather than use .proto files.
Once the type is defined in C#, it's easy en…
-
```
It is often convenient to use a decorated C# class as the authoritative
definition of message types for serialisation, rather than use .proto files.
Once the type is defined in C#, it's easy en…
-
```
It is often convenient to use a decorated C# class as the authoritative
definition of message types for serialisation, rather than use .proto files.
Once the type is defined in C#, it's easy en…
-
```
It is often convenient to use a decorated C# class as the authoritative
definition of message types for serialisation, rather than use .proto files.
Once the type is defined in C#, it's easy en…
-
```
It is often convenient to use a decorated C# class as the authoritative
definition of message types for serialisation, rather than use .proto files.
Once the type is defined in C#, it's easy en…
-
Working with lobid-resources I found a bug.
https://github.com/hbz/lobid-resources/blob/ccc34fc8590340c6fb72d4d9c884746090b7fbf8/src/main/resources/alma/common/subjects.xml#L4-L60
To add a type …
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. In the silverlight runtime, attempt to serialize an object with Xml
attributes rather than DataContract or ProtoContract attributes.
2. The 1st field is …
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. In the silverlight runtime, attempt to serialize an object with Xml
attributes rather than DataContract or ProtoContract attributes.
2. The 1st field is …
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. In the silverlight runtime, attempt to serialize an object with Xml
attributes rather than DataContract or ProtoContract attributes.
2. The 1st field is …