-
**Describe the solution you'd like**
ResearchHub Foundation would like to change the automated peer review copy to reflect some integral changes to how we are systematizing and awarding the paid peer…
-
## Description
### User story
As a Veteran, I want the sign-in widget experience on the unauthenticated Appointments page to offer the latest design-system content, so that i can have a consistent e…
-
## Description
We have identified a a few pain points in the PR review process:
- There is no clearly defined start point from when a 24 hour review time period starts
- There are instances when the…
-
## Description
Content for all of our access alerts have gone through new rounds of approvals and have been published for sitewide usage across any applications that require LOA3 users.
There are ne…
-
_Need help? Please review [how to read a Staging Review ticket](https://depo-platform-documentation.scrollhelp.site/collaboration-cycle/anatomy-of-a-staging-review-issue-ticket). Tag `@platform-govern…
-
**Note:** this ticket should not be submitted until after you receive access to the appropriate repos. You will receive an email titled “USAccess PIV Sponsored” when your access is ready.
## Welcome …
-
It is necessary to develop a printed circuit board (PCB) for the chassis controller.
The general functional system diagram: [Link](https://kpi-rover.github.io/docs/system/architecture)
The PCB r…
-
So, I have a suggestion that came to mind recently: Since we have a 14-day time span, I was thinking that some reviewers might be taking advantage of the initial reviews to base theirs on. To prevent …
-
We might need to review once again which parameters should be defined while initialising the class and which while getting the job/flow via make. I feel there are still some inconsistencies.
It's n…
JaGeo updated
2 weeks ago
-
**Note:** this ticket should not be submitted until after you receive access to the appropriate repos. You will receive an email titled “USAccess PIV Sponsored” when your access is ready.
## Welcome …