-
```
This is more a Enhancement requests than a bug; but I didn't know of a better
place to send it.
What steps will reproduce the problem?
If you use the code below, without the "Assert.AreNotEqua…
-
This is a similar issue to #24, but my query is about using runtests and a simple naming scheme/pattern to invoke test fixtures on a _per test case_ basis. I'll explain by example...
My intent was to…
-
```
When tests are disabled (by prepending 'DISABLED_' to the test name), gtest
displays a warning at the end of its output, i.e.
YOU HAVE 2 DISABLED TESTS
It would be useful if this message di…
-
```
When tests are disabled (by prepending 'DISABLED_' to the test name), gtest
displays a warning at the end of its output, i.e.
YOU HAVE 2 DISABLED TESTS
It would be useful if this message di…
-
```
When tests are disabled (by prepending 'DISABLED_' to the test name), gtest
displays a warning at the end of its output, i.e.
YOU HAVE 2 DISABLED TESTS
It would be useful if this message di…
-
```
When tests are disabled (by prepending 'DISABLED_' to the test name), gtest
displays a warning at the end of its output, i.e.
YOU HAVE 2 DISABLED TESTS
It would be useful if this message di…
-
```
When tests are disabled (by prepending 'DISABLED_' to the test name), gtest
displays a warning at the end of its output, i.e.
YOU HAVE 2 DISABLED TESTS
It would be useful if this message di…
-
```
When tests are disabled (by prepending 'DISABLED_' to the test name), gtest
displays a warning at the end of its output, i.e.
YOU HAVE 2 DISABLED TESTS
It would be useful if this message di…
-
```
When tests are disabled (by prepending 'DISABLED_' to the test name), gtest
displays a warning at the end of its output, i.e.
YOU HAVE 2 DISABLED TESTS
It would be useful if this message di…
-
```
When tests are disabled (by prepending 'DISABLED_' to the test name), gtest
displays a warning at the end of its output, i.e.
YOU HAVE 2 DISABLED TESTS
It would be useful if this message di…