-
```
Because I have random sementation faults with the 2.8 version, I wanted to
try the latest dev version.
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Get today's hg repo
2. Try to compile with gcc-4.0…
-
I have a "value" variable of type capnp::schema::Value::Reader. If I'm doing :
if (value.hasList())
{
auto list = value.getList()
// ....
}
I have a sementation fault. If I'm doing isList() …
-
```
Because I have random sementation faults with the 2.8 version, I wanted to
try the latest dev version.
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Get today's hg repo
2. Try to compile with gcc-4.0…
-
```
Because I have random sementation faults with the 2.8 version, I wanted to
try the latest dev version.
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Get today's hg repo
2. Try to compile with gcc-4.0…
-
```
Because I have random sementation faults with the 2.8 version, I wanted to
try the latest dev version.
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Get today's hg repo
2. Try to compile with gcc-4.0…
-
```
Because I have random sementation faults with the 2.8 version, I wanted to
try the latest dev version.
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Get today's hg repo
2. Try to compile with gcc-4.0…
-
```
Because I have random sementation faults with the 2.8 version, I wanted to
try the latest dev version.
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Get today's hg repo
2. Try to compile with gcc-4.0…
-
```
Because I have random sementation faults with the 2.8 version, I wanted to
try the latest dev version.
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Get today's hg repo
2. Try to compile with gcc-4.0…
-
```
Because I have random sementation faults with the 2.8 version, I wanted to
try the latest dev version.
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Get today's hg repo
2. Try to compile with gcc-4.0…
-
```
Because I have random sementation faults with the 2.8 version, I wanted to
try the latest dev version.
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Get today's hg repo
2. Try to compile with gcc-4.0…