-
Hello, thank you for publishing this document, I'm happy to follow along and see where it leads.
It appears that certain concepts in this paper are derived directly from the 0xcert white paper and/…
-
Please note that the DID AuthN review period will end by August 11th. The goal is to decide whether to use the SIOP spec in the course of the interop project.
The current proposal/ paper can be fo…
awoie updated
5 years ago
-
As discussed in the conversation about https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-spec/pull/22, the current language around DIDs slips into expansive language about "identities" where the more rigorous language r…
-
I'd like to suggest rewriting Section 5 User Sequences to instead use Constantine & Lockwood's Essential Narrative format. Not only should this avoid some of the dependence on architectural assumption…
-
# New Work Item Proposal
See [W3C-CCG New Work Item Process](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vj811aUbs8GwZUNo-LIFBHafsz4rZTSnRtPv7RQaqNc/edit#)
## Include Link to Abstract or Draft
The c…
-
Dear all,
I am working on an extension of the Verifiable Claims Data Model for the European Commission's Europass Project, which is creating a framework for digitally-signed credentials. More infor…
-
The term "identity owner" is problematic in a few ways.
The simplest, practical argument is that proof of control (via private key) does not actually establish or prove ownership. Anyone could easi…
-
You can read the current definitions of the Solid mission, vision, and values on https://github.com/solid/information/blob/master/solid-vision.md
Just to recap the meaning of each of the terms:
…
-
In section 4.3 it states "it MUST be assumed the key has been revoked or is invalid" which isn't outlined in the rules very well and I believe is leading to the assumption that a DID can be created wi…
-
Hi, my name is Will Abramson. I'm a recent Computer Science graduate and Software Developer and have been exploring the blockchain space for about 8 months. Hoping to integrate blockchain technology i…