-
```
Why is it required to have the QT Library for C++? That's a big chunk of
code just to use QList and QString (Maybe there is more I'm not seeing).
Why not use the C++ Standard Library?
```
Origin…
-
```
Why is it required to have the QT Library for C++? That's a big chunk of
code just to use QList and QString (Maybe there is more I'm not seeing).
Why not use the C++ Standard Library?
```
Origin…
-
```
Why is it required to have the QT Library for C++? That's a big chunk of
code just to use QList and QString (Maybe there is more I'm not seeing).
Why not use the C++ Standard Library?
```
Origin…
-
```
Why is it required to have the QT Library for C++? That's a big chunk of
code just to use QList and QString (Maybe there is more I'm not seeing).
Why not use the C++ Standard Library?
```
Origin…
-
```
Why is it required to have the QT Library for C++? That's a big chunk of
code just to use QList and QString (Maybe there is more I'm not seeing).
Why not use the C++ Standard Library?
```
Origin…
-
Would it be possible to incorporate type signature search in the current search bar. Something resembling Hoogle like functionality.
I would really like to be able to search for `(a → b) → f a → f b`…
-
```
Why is it required to have the QT Library for C++? That's a big chunk of
code just to use QList and QString (Maybe there is more I'm not seeing).
Why not use the C++ Standard Library?
```
Origin…
-
```
Why is it required to have the QT Library for C++? That's a big chunk of
code just to use QList and QString (Maybe there is more I'm not seeing).
Why not use the C++ Standard Library?
```
Origin…
-
```
Why is it required to have the QT Library for C++? That's a big chunk of
code just to use QList and QString (Maybe there is more I'm not seeing).
Why not use the C++ Standard Library?
```
Origin…
-
```
Why is it required to have the QT Library for C++? That's a big chunk of
code just to use QList and QString (Maybe there is more I'm not seeing).
Why not use the C++ Standard Library?
```
Origin…