-
We should try to do this for all the new POS classes.
-
Kover 0.8.1 and previous versions are incorrectly calculating the branch % for some reified extensions. Below is a snippet on how to reproduce the observed error:
Internal Function:
```Kotlin
int…
-
Currently the coverage stands somewhere around 50 - 60%. I guess there are the following reasons:
- There are too few packages in `environment.yml` -> many of the functionalities cannot be tested
…
-
Since we had to move from codecov.io, we lost the ability to view the line-by-line coverage report. This helps us know where to focus additional tests, etc. Let's add the covr::report() html from a lo…
-
Context: 8 1 | value_to_sl
Type: Error
Description: add_access_to_phone_coverage handles undefined coverage responses
Tested Function: 8 1 | value_to_sl
Test File: 'test-add_access_to_ph…
-
Context: 8 1 | value_to_sl
Type: Error
Description: add_access_to_phone_coverage correctly categorizes network coverage
Tested Function: 8 1 | value_to_sl
Test File: 'test-add_access_to_…
-
### What Happened
Seems to be unable to get serialized test coverage whilst also printing the standard text to console.
```bash
# Creates test.cov but gives no text output
vendor/bin/pest --cove…
-
### Rule Definition
The `xslt-code-coverage-behavior-by-element.md` file has "Element Specific - TBD" for the rule for descendants of `xsl:merge`, but does have information about trace details for th…
-
This issue is a draft. Code-coverage pain points will be updated by @tzdybal.
- [x] #1268
types:
- [ ] Create test for `types/Header.UnmarshalBinary`
- [ ] Create test for `types/Data.MarshalB…
-
**Describe the enhancement request**
Similar to what was done here https://github.com/kkrt-labs/kakarot-rpc/pull/1243, it would be interesting to add a complete test coverage (covering all poss…