-
- [x] Cover pages
- [x] one for LF
- [x] one for OMG
- [x] Copyrights and licensing page -- #1010
- [x] #1036
- [x] Table of contents
- [x] Preface (add for OMG version of spec) -- #1011
…
-
**Describe the bug**
With the Helics image surfactant currently fails to generate an output in the SPDX format.
**To Reproduce**
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
1. Install latest main of surfac…
-
To verify the license and copyright of every file and that everything in order in every PR:
- https://reuse.software/
- https://github.com/fsfe/reuse-tool/
- https://github.com/marketplace/actions/…
-
# Overview
For example, `spdx` is often used in other metadata systems.
Example from Datacite notation:
```json
"rightsList": [
{
"rights": "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 In…
-
Following the various instructions to generate I am getting the following output:
![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/62eea400-b701-4d17-a235-cd18621c1c87)
The repo steps were:…
-
## Background
- In post-3.0.0 spec-parser, RDF.type was added to non-vocabulary named individuals, so SHACL can validate that the node is of the correct type (see rational here https://github.com/s…
-
**1.** License Name: SMAIL GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
**2.** Short identifier: SMAIL
**3.** License Author or steward:
**4.** Comments: Found while checking licenses in NixOS, also appears in Debian in t…
-
**1.** License Name: harbour exception
**2.** Short identifier: harbour-exception
**3.** License Author or steward: unknown
**4.** Comments: harbour license exception for its library
**5.** License Re…
-
[bug.spdx.json.txt](https://github.com/spdx/tools-python/files/13964995/bug.spdx.json.txt)
[bug.spdx.txt](https://github.com/spdx/tools-python/files/13964996/bug.spdx.txt)
`bug.spdx.json`is vali…
-
Some software projects are dually or multiply licensed. This is something that we should probably support, perhaps via [expressions](https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/SPDX-license-expressions/)?
Ano…