-
Hi Scott, thanks for the great package.
I am using etwfe in a Poisson regression with an exposure variable.
etwfe() works but emfx() returns an error message.
Example using mpdta data and the lp…
-
Hello Alex,
First of all thanks for helping develop all these cool R packages!
I have just one small question, is it possible to use this package to wild cluster my standard errors in an event …
-
Hi, thanks a lot for writing the command!
I had an exchange with Jonathan on twitter for a problem with the package. Please see below.
Best
Giorgio
***
My system info:
MacBook Pro (13-…
-
Hi,
First of all, thanks for all the amazing work on this package!
I was just playing around a bit with the data generated in this post: https://psantanna.com/posts/twfe
The last version in thi…
-
Hi Laurent,
First of all, thank you so much for this package, it is truly amazing the public good you have created.
I'm having some trouble with memory: I have a computer with 10gb of RAM and a d…
-
Great work, Grant!
Is there a straightforward way to overlay two different CIs here (I was thinking 99%-CI blue, 95%-CI lighter blue, ...)?
A bit like here:
![image](https://user-images.github…
-
Implement the estimation method that is robust to treatment effects heterogeneity, proposed by [Sun and Abraham (2021)](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S030440762030378X?via%3Dih…
-
First of all, thank you for this package!
I was running this on my own data after TWFE with an attempt to see the breakdown of the treatment effects in different comparison groups but received this…
-
How does the DID approach treat time invariant variables? In the TWFE framework, which I am most used to, my understanding is that the there is no need to include time invariant variables as controls;…
-
Good afternoon,
I just wanted to report a strange behaviour in the `did` package. Seems like the reported pre-treatment period parameters for the "universal" base period seem to be "inverted" when …