-
```
I think this two should have better default values.
# cat /sys/block/zram0/queue/read_ahead_kb
128
# cat /sys/block/zram0/queue/rotational
1
#
rotationl should be 0, obviously.
As of read_ahea…
-
```
Hello ,
About 2 month ago , you've said (on issue 87) that you will be sending "zram
patch with numdevices as kernel config option and the discard support" for
mainline inclusion soon.
Since …
-
```
I think this two should have better default values.
# cat /sys/block/zram0/queue/read_ahead_kb
128
# cat /sys/block/zram0/queue/rotational
1
#
rotationl should be 0, obviously.
As of read_ahea…
-
```
I think this two should have better default values.
# cat /sys/block/zram0/queue/read_ahead_kb
128
# cat /sys/block/zram0/queue/rotational
1
#
rotationl should be 0, obviously.
As of read_ahea…
-
```
I think this two should have better default values.
# cat /sys/block/zram0/queue/read_ahead_kb
128
# cat /sys/block/zram0/queue/rotational
1
#
rotationl should be 0, obviously.
As of read_ahea…
-
```
I think this two should have better default values.
# cat /sys/block/zram0/queue/read_ahead_kb
128
# cat /sys/block/zram0/queue/rotational
1
#
rotationl should be 0, obviously.
As of read_ahea…
-
```
Hello ,
About 2 month ago , you've said (on issue 87) that you will be sending "zram
patch with numdevices as kernel config option and the discard support" for
mainline inclusion soon.
Since …
-
```
Hello ,
About 2 month ago , you've said (on issue 87) that you will be sending "zram
patch with numdevices as kernel config option and the discard support" for
mainline inclusion soon.
Since …
-
```
Hello ,
About 2 month ago , you've said (on issue 87) that you will be sending "zram
patch with numdevices as kernel config option and the discard support" for
mainline inclusion soon.
Since …
-
```
Hello ,
About 2 month ago , you've said (on issue 87) that you will be sending "zram
patch with numdevices as kernel config option and the discard support" for
mainline inclusion soon.
Since …