-
Going over the [ODRL Validation](https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Validation) document, 1.2 Validation section I noticed:
1. I suggest to follow the spelling of classes and properties in the IM: cl…
-
> ODRL **processors** ...
what's an ODRL _processor_? we only define ODRL _validator_ and ODRL _evaluator_ in the [Terminology](https://w3c.github.io/poe/model/#terminology).
> ... are required…
-
In 2016, Steven Anderson [argued on DC-ARCHITECTURE](../blob/master/proposals/2018_iso-related/ranges_discussion.txt) that the following properties had assigned ranges different from ranges used in pr…
-
Hi!
While developing simple custom based RDF validation library using your SHACL
implementation, on docs page I found https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl-af/#rules , which is also
incredibly useful fo…
-
Should we keep xsd:positiveInteger instead of xsd:integer in the data?
A few info I gathered this morning:
- Fuseki converts all integer types to `xsd:integer`, so query results don't know the ori…
eroux updated
7 years ago
-
As I understand from previous conversations and from the current spec., the odrl:assigner and odrl:assignee cannot be longer used at the policy level, only at the rule level. The current ontology defi…
-
Technically, the data model supports a single credential making claims about multiple subjects:
```
{
"@context": ["http://schema.org/", "https://w3id.org/identity/v1"],
"id": "http://exampl…
-
Is the behaviour of SHACL Core implementations undefined if the only invalid
part of a shapes graph is a SHACL-SPARQL construct? For example, is the
behaviour of a SHACL Core implemenatation define…
-
At the call on 19 June - https://www.w3.org/2017/06/19-poe-minutes - the question was raised if something required for testing is missing in the ontology.
I think the definition of the cardinality of…
-
Hi there and thanks for this amazing open source product,
I was wondering if there is a possibility to query an endpoint via the SHACL engine (and how, if so)? I believe this engine converts the ru…