-
Previous downgrade related PR(#11362, #11492) are both too big to review. Let's open this issue to track downgrade implementation progress this time. I'll break it down into small tasks and get them m…
-
**Rancher Server Setup**
- Rancher version: 2.8.4 and 2.8.5
- Installation option (Docker install/Helm Chart): docker install
**Information about the Cluster**
- Kubernetes version: `v1.28.10+rk…
-
### Current Behavior
![dc](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a8d83c72-d71d-482d-8238-d84cd6299cef)
![dr](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/488ad185-652c-48dc-b1d5-0df189641c26)
…
-
## Bug Report
Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!
### 1. Minimal reproduce step (Required)
```
make race
```
```
unexpected fault address 0x0
fatal e…
-
Would be nice if other applications could connect to etcd using a static VIP instead of via SRV record. For Calico, we would no longer need to run an etcd-proxy on every agent :smile:
-
Currently the features are behind features flags and must be enabled explicitly either on cluster level or the seed controller level. This epic should track the issues required to get the features to …
-
## etcd 使用小结
### Revision
`Revision` 表示改动序号(ID),每次 KV 的变化,leader 节点都会修改 `Revision` 值,因此,这个值在 cluster(集群)内是全局唯一的,而且是递增的。
需要特别说明的是,`Revision`、`ModRevison` 与 `Version` 三者之间的区别:
- `ModRevison`…
-
This adds support for etcd as a cluster, plus nice syntax. I'm also getting a problem with current library reading members list, so I'll go for a refactor and sibmit a pull request.
-
Currently Consul is only supported for perform sequential updates. would be nice if we could accomplish this with etcd as well.
-
**What happened**:
At first, I used the wrong targetPort in the service, created the associated ingress but could not be accessed, so I fixed the targetPort of the service. I think the ingress should…