-
```
Folks, ClearTK could really use some basic evaluation infrastructure for
classifier-based annotators. I recently implemented an interface for
evaluation for another project for evaluating clea…
-
```
We need to provide a mechanism for returning K-best results from a
classifier for sequential tagging tasks. There are two primary drivers for
this. 1) a viterbi-style search through the space of…
-
```
Folks, ClearTK could really use some basic evaluation infrastructure for
classifier-based annotators. I recently implemented an interface for
evaluation for another project for evaluating clea…
-
```
We need to provide a mechanism for returning K-best results from a
classifier for sequential tagging tasks. There are two primary drivers for
this. 1) a viterbi-style search through the space of…
-
```
Philip:
I would like to propose a pretty significant change to the way our code is organized. Here are my motivations:
- simplify dependencies so that they are more localized to the ClearTK co…
-
```
Philip:
I would like to propose a pretty significant change to the way our code is organized. Here are my motivations:
- simplify dependencies so that they are more localized to the ClearTK co…
-
```
We need to provide a mechanism for returning K-best results from a
classifier for sequential tagging tasks. There are two primary drivers for
this. 1) a viterbi-style search through the space of…
-
```
We need to provide a mechanism for returning K-best results from a
classifier for sequential tagging tasks. There are two primary drivers for
this. 1) a viterbi-style search through the space of…
-
```
Philip:
I would like to propose a pretty significant change to the way our code is organized. Here are my motivations:
- simplify dependencies so that they are more localized to the ClearTK co…
-
```
Philip:
I would like to propose a pretty significant change to the way our code is organized. Here are my motivations:
- simplify dependencies so that they are more localized to the ClearTK co…