-
Hi there – I'm compiling on `arm64-apple-darwin23.5.0` (see end), and using libdwarf 0.10.1 (see end.)
Apparently, homebrew, the package manager, aliases libdwarf to dwarfutils.
Assuming the version…
-
This was originally added as a ticket under POSIX, but `fscanf()` is not a POSIX function. It is from C89.
https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/io/fscanf
The expectation from the POSIX API is that th…
-
This was originally added as a ticket under POSIX, but `scanf()` is not a POSIX function. It is from C89.
https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/io/scanf
The expectation from the POSIX API is that this…
-
This was originally added as a ticket under POSIX, but `vscanf()` is not a POSIX function. It is from C89.
https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/io/vfscanf
The expectation from the POSIX API is that t…
-
| | |
|--------------------|----|
| Bugzilla Link | [PR18041](https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18041) |
| Status | NEW |
| Importance | P normal |
|…
-
-
Is it your intention to be standards-compliant? Not trying to be nit-picky here, but the standards define the preprocessor's behavior to a certain level of precision, and the rules for expansions in …
ghost updated
3 years ago
-
I've rebased my branch for legacy Windows, and my handy C89 pedantry checker called VC++6 phoned in.
Unfortunately, this one is a bit trickier for a refactor because it's doing some lexical shenani…
-
### Description
I am using the nlohmann/json version 3.10.5 toolkit on this platform to build a new product with HPE's ported GNU C++ compiler. I have tried with both the c89 and c11 compilers so tha…
-
| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [18041](https://llvm.org/bz18041) |
| Version | trunk |
| OS | All |
| CC | @zygoloid |
## Extended Description
I compiled three test codes with -std=c89 comp…