-
**Reported by cbertsch on 8 Jan 2017 08:06 UTC**
The FMI Compliance Checker 2.0.3 does currently not check for mandatory elements of the model structure in the modeldescription.xml
p.58 of the FMI 2.…
-
The FMI standard requires, that you provide meaningful start values for inputs. https://github.com/modelica/fmi-guides/issues/31
However, when one exports FMUs with FMI-Kit, the start values for in…
-
Do we need to reference a definition of the CSV file?
Currently we have
- https://github.com/modelica/fmi-standard.org/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#csv-rules-for-inout-and-result-files-for-compati…
-
environment
ubuntu22.04
python=3.9.19
pyfmi=2.13.0
CoSimulation model fmiVersion=2
issue
model_sub1 = FMUModelCS2("./Sin.fmu")
model_sub2 = FMUModelCS2("./Sin2.fmu")
models = [model_sub1,…
-
According to FMI standard using INF in xml files is not allowed (https://github.com/modelica/fmi-standard/issues/1784).
If there is a Simulink block Saturation, where the upper limit has the value …
-
Power companies often have custom dynamic models that they are accustomed to using in their simulations. The symbolic modeling features of Andes make it convenient to add new models, but users may wis…
-
We currently have a zoo of configuration options:
| **Adapter or tool** | **Format** |
|---------------------|----------------------------------|
| CalculiX adapter | yml…
-
should we have outputs defined or treat outputs just like any other related variable?
if we have outputs, how to represent them and what are the constraints?
-
Hi all,
The [FMU checker](https://fmu-check.herokuapp.com/) provided in http://fmi-standard.org/ shows some issues when checking the fmu created with `pythonfmu build`.
sunne updated
3 years ago
-
This is just some questions, because we need to take a decision about the implementation of distributed FMI using a comercial simulation tool like Labview / Simulik / Vector / Siemens ... .
a) Any…