-
```
I was interested in using a hash for integer arrays with few numbers in them.
So I searched for any collisions in a very sample case: unique triplets of
numbers of the form (i,j,k) , where 1
-
```
I was interested in using a hash for integer arrays with few numbers in them.
So I searched for any collisions in a very sample case: unique triplets of
numbers of the form (i,j,k) , where 1
-
```
I was interested in using a hash for integer arrays with few numbers in them.
So I searched for any collisions in a very sample case: unique triplets of
numbers of the form (i,j,k) , where 1
-
```
I was interested in using a hash for integer arrays with few numbers in them.
So I searched for any collisions in a very sample case: unique triplets of
numbers of the form (i,j,k) , where 1
-
```
I was interested in using a hash for integer arrays with few numbers in them.
So I searched for any collisions in a very sample case: unique triplets of
numbers of the form (i,j,k) , where 1
-
```
There are some performance problems with the CharMatcher.
1. Missing `setBits`.
The precomputation may take up to 1/3 millisecond due to missing method
`anyOf.setBits`. Adding the one-liner mak…
-
```
I was interested in using a hash for integer arrays with few numbers in them.
So I searched for any collisions in a very sample case: unique triplets of
numbers of the form (i,j,k) , where 1
-
```
There are some performance problems with the CharMatcher.
1. Missing `setBits`.
The precomputation may take up to 1/3 millisecond due to missing method
`anyOf.setBits`. Adding the one-liner mak…
-
```
I was interested in using a hash for integer arrays with few numbers in them.
So I searched for any collisions in a very sample case: unique triplets of
numbers of the form (i,j,k) , where 1
-
```
I was interested in using a hash for integer arrays with few numbers in them.
So I searched for any collisions in a very sample case: unique triplets of
numbers of the form (i,j,k) , where 1