-
Continuing discussion from #2
Should we have 1 sweep function or multiple nested (user-defined) measurement functions?
E.g. for each B, apply my_pulse 10.000x and monitor the system for 10 minutes
…
guenp updated
8 years ago
-
```
>>> from mpmath import secant
>>> f = lambda x: (x-1)**100
>>> secant(f, 0)
mpf('0.33989945043882264')
>>> secant(f, 0, 3)
mpf('-4.7331654313260708e-30')
>>> g = lambda x: x**2
>>> secant(g, -2)
m…
-
```
>>> from mpmath import secant
>>> f = lambda x: (x-1)**100
>>> secant(f, 0)
mpf('0.33989945043882264')
>>> secant(f, 0, 3)
mpf('-4.7331654313260708e-30')
>>> g = lambda x: x**2
>>> secant(g, -2)
m…
-
Hello Phil,
I've got weird model fit indices in M2() function with 1.10 releases when try to calculate confirmatory models.
In case of 1.9;
**100
>>> secant(f, 0)
mpf('0.33989945043882264')
>>> secant(f, 0, 3)
mpf('-4.7331654313260708e-30')
>>> g = lambda x: x**2
>>> secant(g, -2)
m…
-
```
mpf and mpc are a lot slower than python floats and comlpexes. Sometimes
I'd like to take advantage of all the nice algorithms in mpmath (like
special functions, ODE solvers), but I'd like them to…
-
The .SIFlux output file from a frequency-integrated scuff-neq run contains an entry for every frequency the adaptive integrator tries, even if they weren't used in the computation. These entries shoul…
-
```
mpf and mpc are a lot slower than python floats and comlpexes. Sometimes
I'd like to take advantage of all the nice algorithms in mpmath (like
special functions, ODE solvers), but I'd like them to…
-
```
mpf and mpc are a lot slower than python floats and comlpexes. Sometimes
I'd like to take advantage of all the nice algorithms in mpmath (like
special functions, ODE solvers), but I'd like them to…
-
A quick and easy way to get ode23 and ode45 like in MATLAB is:
http://www.netlib.org/ode/rksuite/
The state of the art is SUNDIALS, but it is no longer maintained. The lead developer went to develop…