-
I have some architectural queries about UAF implementations after considering FIDO 2.0 spec:
In my problem,
I need to establish that device has an embedded authenticator and then extablish connec…
-
This is more of question than anything else.
Section 1 - Use Cases says:
“Additionally, privacy across WebAuthn Relying Parties must be maintained; scripts must not be able to detect any properties, o…
-
The [WebAuthn Authenticator model](https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#authenticator-model) looks like the same interface as [CTAP's Authenticator API](https://fidoalliance.org/specs/fido-v2.0-rd-20161004…
-
The following code from [fido2/hid.py](https://github.com/Yubico/python-fido2/blob/master/fido2/hid.py#L83) assumes that successful CTAPHID responses will have the same command field as the initial re…
-
I got the impression that the provided examples could be understood in a wrong way as they lack an important detail:
As far as I understood W3C Web Authentication / CTAP supported transports are US…
-
## What protocol and version of the protocol are you testing?
FIDO2
## What is your implementation class?
Authr
## What is the version of the tool are you using?
0.9.413
## Issue des…
-
Sec 5.4 lists id, displayName, and name
Sec 5.4.3 only lists id and displayName as required in the dictionary.
Should name be optional?
The CTAP spec states
This PublicKeyCredentialUserEntit…
-
The next version of the CTAP specifications will change the term `CTAP canonical CBOR` to `CTAP2 canonical CBOR`. WebAuthn specs should be updated accordingly.
-
It's possible I'm just not using the library correctly. However, I could open the device with open(2). When I do it shows the following in dmesg:
uhid0 at uhidev0: input=64, output=64, feature=0
Not…
-
Since the lack of time for reviewing full documents, I added some suggestions after reading the part of the specs.
1. In Abstract section, there is a high level description of this spec. Since atte…
Kieun updated
6 years ago