-
The current license of the project is "do what you want to". While we really get the message, unfortunately, it means little from the legal point of view. I suggest to switch to https://creativecommon…
-
Hi,
I was looking into packaging `xnat4tests` for Fedora since [xnatpy](https://gitlab.com/radiology/infrastructure/xnatpy) requires it for running tests. However, the current license provided in t…
-
@jrhea @prestonvanloon, I assumed that you were OK with relicensing your MIT/Apache contributions to the starting scripts to nim-beacon-chain to CC0.
I choose CC0 just to be the same as the eth2.0-…
-
Currently, we set
permission= {{PLOS}}
for all PLOS articles.
This defaults to CC BY 2.5, but quite a few PLOS articles are actually CC0, so that should be indicated. Perhaps best to add a license pa…
-
CC0 is probably not an appropriate license for this repository, since the actual code hosted here is LGPLv3 or MIT, depending on the project.
-
Load data from Merck's Drug Indication Database (DID), which is explicitly CC0-licensed: https://jbiomedsem.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13326-016-0110-0
192k indications aggregated from man…
-
Add the CC0 license (Creative Commons Zero) for photo uploads.
-
## Description
_A free CC0 album by Matt Pin. This album is licensed under the Creative Commons CC0 license, which means you can use it for any purpose, including commercial use, without any attr…
-
Legal Notices:
Copyright © 1983-2024 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.
-
I'd been pondering this a little while. Famously, the CC0-1.0 licence is not approved by the OSI. It's not disapproved either—it exists in a weird uncomfortable state where the OSI says that "yeah if …