-
https://github.com/j3-fortran/generics/blob/4e273a9b394a0e48a217fcf307c0ddb598475dd2/J3-Papers/Generics_Requirements.txt#L214-L217
Does this mean subgroup is not considering type-bound procedures f…
-
Dear all,
I start with my first question for you, with the hope you are interested to discuss on.
In my _best practices_ I always considered the _standard compliance_ as a guideline of paramount rel…
-
I feel that there is an almost unanimous agreement on that `implicit none` must be mandatory, but I guess many of you will provide interesting _exceptions_, so
> do you agree to advice to be explici…
-
Extracted from #49. Author: Van Snyder
# Introduction
The proposal for which authorization to proceed as an ISO Technical Specification was requested
in June 2016 was N2113.
Incorrect use of…
-
A very common request is to allow templates for subroutines or functions, in order to allow code like the following:
```fortran
function f(x)
, intent(in) :: x
f = x + 1
end func…
-
Here we can discuss the benchmarks analysis.
It could be useful to compare with the performance of other non abstract implementations.
| Architecture | Comparison with other non ACP | Conclusion |
|…
-
A common request is to simplify how to do array of strings. Currently one option is this:
```fortran
type string
character(:), allocatable :: s
end type
integer, parameter :: N = 5
type(st…
-
I see great value in implementing a variety of simple yet real-world algorithms in Fortran and benchmarking them along multiple axes:
* Different problem sizes (e.g. array or matrix size)
* DIffer…
-
@FortranFan submitted this at #105, I moved it to a separate issue here, so that we do not derail a discussion at #105.
---
Sorry for going off-topic but to me this proposal looks rather straigh…
-
Currently each compiler must develop its own tests for every feature in the standard. One could imagine, down the road, that the committee can maintain a "blessed" set of tests for each feature in the…