-
I did a small toy benchmark on the overhead induced by calling R through rpy2, in this case `glmnet::glmnet()` through rpy2, and there seems to be a bit:
```python
from timeit import default_timer…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
x=randn(100,20); y=randn(100,1); fit=glmnet(x,y);
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
it shoudl return a struct. Instead it returns
…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
x=randn(100,20); y=randn(100,1); fit=glmnet(x,y);
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
it shoudl return a struct. Instead it returns
…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
x=randn(100,20); y=randn(100,1); fit=glmnet(x,y);
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
it shoudl return a struct. Instead it returns
…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
x=randn(100,20); y=randn(100,1); fit=glmnet(x,y);
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
it shoudl return a struct. Instead it returns
…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
x=randn(100,20); y=randn(100,1); fit=glmnet(x,y);
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
it shoudl return a struct. Instead it returns
…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
x=randn(100,20); y=randn(100,1); fit=glmnet(x,y);
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
it shoudl return a struct. Instead it returns
…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
x=randn(100,20); y=randn(100,1); fit=glmnet(x,y);
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
it shoudl return a struct. Instead it returns
…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
x=randn(100,20); y=randn(100,1); fit=glmnet(x,y);
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
it shoudl return a struct. Instead it returns
…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
x=randn(100,20); y=randn(100,1); fit=glmnet(x,y);
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
it shoudl return a struct. Instead it returns
…