-
```
There seems to be a regression in Hamcrest 1.3.RC2 (might date from earlier
versions) when compared to Hamcrest 1.1, to do with nested matchers. The
following test case works in Hamcrest 1.1:
…
-
Assume an LLM responds with something like
```java
package com.eval;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import org.mockito.InMockito;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.*;
…
-
While the Hamcrest repo is still [active](https://github.com/hamcrest/JavaHamcrest/commits/master), the latest release is from [Oct 16, 2019 ](https://github.com/hamcrest/JavaHamcrest/tags)
I thi…
-
It seems that jpeek has a compile time dependency to Hamcrest, which is a test library as follow:
- `TkReport` depends on `HmRsStatus` from takes
- `HmRsStatus` is an Hamcrest `Matcher` implementati…
-
DNS for hamcrest.org seems to have gone away. Who owns that?
-
```
There seems to be a regression in Hamcrest 1.3.RC2 (might date from earlier
versions) when compared to Hamcrest 1.1, to do with nested matchers. The
following test case works in Hamcrest 1.1:
…
-
```
There seems to be a regression in Hamcrest 1.3.RC2 (might date from earlier
versions) when compared to Hamcrest 1.1, to do with nested matchers. The
following test case works in Hamcrest 1.1:
…
-
see : http://danhaywood.com/2015/04/17/converting-from-hamcrest-to-assertj/
Fix also the existing scripts as some regex are not correct
-
@npryce has nicely summed up the reasons to do this in his blog:
http://www.natpryce.com/articles/000806.html
-
```
There seems to be a regression in Hamcrest 1.3.RC2 (might date from earlier
versions) when compared to Hamcrest 1.1, to do with nested matchers. The
following test case works in Hamcrest 1.1:
…