-
I might be wrong but it seems to me that the two last argument order when calling get_nadir_point in nsga3 is wrong (at least from the api point of view)
The function is defined as follow
```pytho…
fmder updated
5 years ago
-
在使用的过程中发现一个疑问,望指教。
```
NIND = 100 # Set the number of individuals.
```
设置种群数量为100个,但是在测试问题中的aimFuc(self, Vars, CV)函数中ObjV维度是: (91, 3),不应该是(100, 3)吗?
-
您好,是否存在NSGA3或者MOEA/D?
-
```
problem = MyProblem(dataset)
ref_dirs = UniformReferenceDirectionFactory(3, n_points=91).do()
res = minimize(problem,
method='nsga3',
method_args={
…
-
Hello,
I created a problem with 4 objectives and compared the performance of NSGA2 and NSGA3 on this problem. I also tried to solve the problem with Genetic Algorithm, which should be working for s…
-
Write test cases that check for random algorithm instances and problems that no exception occurs.
-
There is a spurious print statement: `System.out.println(referencePoints.size());`
-
Bug (calculateNormalizedObjectivesInFronts (fronts)):
_.forEach(fronts, function (f) {
_.forEach(f, function (solution) {
solution.nsga3.values = _.map(solution.nsga3.va…
-
Hello,
I will test the performance of NSGA2, NSGA3 and SPEA2 algorithms on multi-objective multi-dimensional knapsack problem. As per defined in the manual, I am trying to collect best know algorithm…
-
Hello,
My algorithm (NSGA2, NSGA3 and SPEA2 ) produces only one solution instead of pareto optimal set. I run my own Knapsack problem with 2 objectives and the dataset is produced from "USDA National…